The facts about being a realist
**I make no apologies for the following rant. If you are reading this, you are bored enough to take it.**
As a realist, you don't always get to do what you dream. You learn how to compromise early on. You realize that there is no ideal, but merely a best option out of many. The worst is when you are both a dreamer and a realist. That's what everyone tells you to be, right? "Keep your feet on the ground and keep reaching for the stars..." That one makes me ill. Kipling puts it in less juvenile (and less nauseating) terms: "If you can dream---and not make dreams your master." But it all seems to amount to the same thing. Eventually, you will have to give up some dream. (I know that I am starting to sound melodramatic, like a teenage girl on MTV, but hear me out). Rationally, that is what all this about dreams comes down to. (See, now I'm even ending sentences with infinitives.) It's a cop-out really. The people in charge don't want to say directly that there is something that you are not nor will ever be able to do, so instead they say that, "oh, well, you have to keep your feet on the ground!" Like it's a good thing. Or they might not even be saying that. One of the most important things that anyone had ever said to me was by Mr. Roberts in seventh grade. If you know Mr. Roberts, he isn't very serious, but this was the day he had conferences with the students about their grades or something, and he sat in the hall and wore his glasses, and when it was my turn, I sat down and he smiled and said, "Steven, you can do anything you want to do." Coming from someone who almost never said anything personal and serious at the same time, that meant a lot. But even me, who has been validated by none other than Mr. Roberts, middle school grography teacher, has been swayed by circumstance. And I know that some of you have, too. And now I am wondering whether it is best to play the game intelligently, or whether it is better to be intuitive. If you play intelligently, you are sure to come out ahead. But is coming out ahead the most important thing? The thing that brought this all on was Everwoood (I know, I shouldn't let family TV shows that are meant to provide background noise for calculus affect my world view, but they were discussing college applications, which, you all know, were a big part of my life for a time.) And on Everwood, the dad told his son to close his eyes and imagine himself in four years, happy. I followed along, pretending it was last year, and I realized, that this was not where I would have imagined myself (Don't worry, Megan and any of my other friends who are prone to worry on my behalf. This all turns out good in the end.) In fact, none of the places on my list matched (the closest would be Wash. U.). I wanted to be somewhere I would really be challenged, where people went to coffee shops and discussed philosophy, and in a big city, or else in some well-recognised countryside with an antiquated, sleepy, but colorful little town along the border. However, colleges in big, northeastern cities do not give hefty scholarships based on Mr. Robert's reccomandation (or Mrs. Wilson's and Mrs. Hartman's and Mrs. Blackwood's, for that matter). And Vanderbilt, with its drinking games, its bright, but not absurdly so, student body, and its respected, yet unspiring faculty, does. And so I rationalized, as I did when I decided not to waste the time on the Harvards and the Columbias, that since I was going to do graduate work anyway, it would be folly to spend the clams for the Ivy League. I can make do at the "Harvard of the South." And as I write this, I begin to see my point. And I even wonder why I was compelled to write this in the first place. But now that it is written, I suppose I should follow through to a conclusion. This was, indeed, the best choice of all the options given. Even if the dreamer in me continues to think that I have compromised my dream. But, not to fear, there is a brighter way of looking at my situation. What I have believed, and what I continue to believe, is that there is a reason, that I could not afford Harvard. And there is also a reason that Vanderbilt extended this offer to me, drawing me away from a future at OU. I believe that God (or fate, or just blind luck) made this opportunity. I have net people here that I would not have met anywhere else. I will have experience here that could not be duplicated at another school. And I cannot even tell you what those are yet, but I believe that they are here for me. And, as a dreamer, I hope to experience every one, and as a realist, I know that between studying and clubs and sleep and a certain set of beliefs that may be considered by some as prohibitive to this goal, that I will not. But in my heart, I believe that what will happen to me in four years will be exactly what is meant to happen. For better or for worse. And I just have to have faith that what I am doing at every moment, I am doing for a reason, and therefore, I should do it to the best of my ability, just as I always have.
Peace. Love. And good night.
Steven M. E.
As a realist, you don't always get to do what you dream. You learn how to compromise early on. You realize that there is no ideal, but merely a best option out of many. The worst is when you are both a dreamer and a realist. That's what everyone tells you to be, right? "Keep your feet on the ground and keep reaching for the stars..." That one makes me ill. Kipling puts it in less juvenile (and less nauseating) terms: "If you can dream---and not make dreams your master." But it all seems to amount to the same thing. Eventually, you will have to give up some dream. (I know that I am starting to sound melodramatic, like a teenage girl on MTV, but hear me out). Rationally, that is what all this about dreams comes down to. (See, now I'm even ending sentences with infinitives.) It's a cop-out really. The people in charge don't want to say directly that there is something that you are not nor will ever be able to do, so instead they say that, "oh, well, you have to keep your feet on the ground!" Like it's a good thing. Or they might not even be saying that. One of the most important things that anyone had ever said to me was by Mr. Roberts in seventh grade. If you know Mr. Roberts, he isn't very serious, but this was the day he had conferences with the students about their grades or something, and he sat in the hall and wore his glasses, and when it was my turn, I sat down and he smiled and said, "Steven, you can do anything you want to do." Coming from someone who almost never said anything personal and serious at the same time, that meant a lot. But even me, who has been validated by none other than Mr. Roberts, middle school grography teacher, has been swayed by circumstance. And I know that some of you have, too. And now I am wondering whether it is best to play the game intelligently, or whether it is better to be intuitive. If you play intelligently, you are sure to come out ahead. But is coming out ahead the most important thing? The thing that brought this all on was Everwoood (I know, I shouldn't let family TV shows that are meant to provide background noise for calculus affect my world view, but they were discussing college applications, which, you all know, were a big part of my life for a time.) And on Everwood, the dad told his son to close his eyes and imagine himself in four years, happy. I followed along, pretending it was last year, and I realized, that this was not where I would have imagined myself (Don't worry, Megan and any of my other friends who are prone to worry on my behalf. This all turns out good in the end.) In fact, none of the places on my list matched (the closest would be Wash. U.). I wanted to be somewhere I would really be challenged, where people went to coffee shops and discussed philosophy, and in a big city, or else in some well-recognised countryside with an antiquated, sleepy, but colorful little town along the border. However, colleges in big, northeastern cities do not give hefty scholarships based on Mr. Robert's reccomandation (or Mrs. Wilson's and Mrs. Hartman's and Mrs. Blackwood's, for that matter). And Vanderbilt, with its drinking games, its bright, but not absurdly so, student body, and its respected, yet unspiring faculty, does. And so I rationalized, as I did when I decided not to waste the time on the Harvards and the Columbias, that since I was going to do graduate work anyway, it would be folly to spend the clams for the Ivy League. I can make do at the "Harvard of the South." And as I write this, I begin to see my point. And I even wonder why I was compelled to write this in the first place. But now that it is written, I suppose I should follow through to a conclusion. This was, indeed, the best choice of all the options given. Even if the dreamer in me continues to think that I have compromised my dream. But, not to fear, there is a brighter way of looking at my situation. What I have believed, and what I continue to believe, is that there is a reason, that I could not afford Harvard. And there is also a reason that Vanderbilt extended this offer to me, drawing me away from a future at OU. I believe that God (or fate, or just blind luck) made this opportunity. I have net people here that I would not have met anywhere else. I will have experience here that could not be duplicated at another school. And I cannot even tell you what those are yet, but I believe that they are here for me. And, as a dreamer, I hope to experience every one, and as a realist, I know that between studying and clubs and sleep and a certain set of beliefs that may be considered by some as prohibitive to this goal, that I will not. But in my heart, I believe that what will happen to me in four years will be exactly what is meant to happen. For better or for worse. And I just have to have faith that what I am doing at every moment, I am doing for a reason, and therefore, I should do it to the best of my ability, just as I always have.
Peace. Love. And good night.
Steven M. E.
